Asian Human Rights Commission - Religious Groups for Human Rights

Home

Archives

AHRC Site

Search this section:
Advanced Search
Printer Friendly Version
Vol. 01. No. 20 (October 25, 1999)


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
RELIGIOUS PERSPECTIVES ON HUMAN RIGHTS

E-Newsletter
Vol.1 No.20
October 25, 1999


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Religious Perspectives on Human Rights is now available online at: http://www.rghr.net

Religious Perspectives on Human Rights is a weekly e-newsletter issued by Buddhist, Muslim, Catholic and Christian Groups on Human Rights, initiated by the Asian Human Rights Commission.


CHALLENGES TO THE CHURCHES AND THE DEMOCRATIC FORCES IN INDONESIA.

Now more than ever before the democratic forces within and outside of the country need to take a critical supportive stand vis a vis the new President, the Vice President and the Parliament. The Indonesian parliament acted with utmost maturity not only in the election of the new leadership but also in chalking out the agenda for the new government.

High in the agenda have been;

  • revoking the decree claiming sovereignty over E. Timor,
  • decision to confer special autonomy to the provinces of Aceh and Irian Jaya and investigate human rights abuses,
  • resolve the carnage in the Maluku Islands and Ambon where religious and communal killings have claimed hundreds of lives,
  • to establish a clean legal system, good governance and recovery from economic crisis,
  • foreign loans to be decreased and the repayment to be restructured ( approval from parliament required before negotiating new foreign borrowings),
  • legislate to eliminate corruption, collusion and nepotism,
  • the 38 seats reserved to the military officers to be abolished during the next five years.

They certainly look monumental seen in the context of a long and protracted authoritarian regime, mounting pressure from the fundamentalist groups, the strong presence of the armed forces, rising aspirations often conflictual from the various segments of the population. These decisions will have to be translated into action if Indonesia is to come out of the present morass and it is here that the commitment of the Churches –Muslim, Buddhist, Christian, and others - and the democratic forces become quite crucial. Passing on this vital information to their constituencies so that the people are in a position not only to collaborate in their implementation but also to monitor their progress. Besides it is up to them to create institutions and processes that can ensure their speedy implementation as well as their ongoing assessment This certainly would be one of the effective ways of allowing democracy to take roots.

The decision, for instance regarding the establishment of a clean legal system and good governance would require a quite a number of responses on the part of the people who are least familiar with such systems and structures in a democratic setup. This would demand not only education on basic human rights but also the training on the due process where collaboration between the NGOs and the government become important. Formation of genuine leadership in and through various economic activities, which might also contribute to the alleviation of poverty, is another area where the Churches can come in. In fact the credibility of the churches as well as of the Ngos will in future be tied to what they can contribute constructively and creatively for the nurturing of democracy in the country.

 


THE AFFIRMATION MADE BY THE YOUTH AT THE END OF THE CAMP ON HUMAN RIGHTS.

Hundred youths representing over twenty countries met in Bangkok from 9-19 October to reflect, share experiences, and charter a course in the fields of Human Rights, Democratization and Peace made the following affirmation at the end of their camp, a part of it is reproduced here. This perhaps could be studied when the youths assemble for various occasions with concrete steps adopted for their implementation.

We affirmed the following:

  1. We will work to establish universal human rights, rooted in human dignity, which transcend differences in race, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, religion, ideology, and socioeconomic status.
  2. We strive to understand and expose the social, economic, political and religious forces which attempt to divide humankind.
  3. We believe that all peoples, including Asians, have a right and obligation to speak freely for themselves about their experiences, practices, and histories, unhindered by government constraints and intimidation.
  4. We recognize and respect indigenous peoples’ values, wisdom, heritage, and methods of cultivation and production, which protect ecological balance.
  5. We support the struggle for self-determination of all people in the world.
  6. We will fight unequal distribution of power, wealth, natural resources, and status between rich and poor, men and women, and ethnic groups.
  7. We call on governments to ensure access to high-quality health care and traditional and alternative education.
  8. We believe that the people should have full access to all forms of modern communications, including broadcast media and the Internet, and that these media should serve the interests of the people.
  9. We demand that governments do not use military force against their own peoples.
  10. We demand that militaries separate themselves from the political functions of government.
  11. We condemn those governments which use the rhetoric of human rights and democracy as a justification for exploiting and oppressing their own and other peoples.
  12. We are gravely concerned about those governments which use their legal systems as instruments for oppressing their people, and we condemn those persons who act to reduce and eliminate the ability of legal systems to protect human rights.

THE FINDINGS OF THE PEOPLES TRIBUNAL ON FOOD SCARCITY AND MILITARISATION.

The Asian Human Rights Commission just released the "Voice of the Hungry Nation", a 170 page report containing evidence, findings and conclusions of the People's Tribunal on Food Scarcity and Militarization in Burma.

Concerned by reports of widespread hunger due to military rule in Burma (Myanmar), in 1997 AHRC began preparing for The People's Tribunal. The Tribunal was created to investigate and expose human rights violations in a nation where legal recourse does not exist. Its purpose was to highlight militarization's devastating effects on Burma's silent, often forgotten rural population. Sitting on the Tribunal were three prominent members of Asia's human rights movement: Justice H. Suresh (India), Professor Mark Tamthai (Thailand) and Dr. Lao Mong Hay (Cambodia)). Throughout 1999 this panel reviewed evidence, took depositions, and deliberated its findings and recommendations.

Voice of the Hungry Nation

In the "Voice of the Hungry Nation" the Tribunal details how Burma's ongoing civil war and militarized economy are gradually starving not only the nation's rice farmers, but even the urban middle class. Scores of witnesses relate how forty years of military rule have eroded agrarian life and played havoc with the economy.

In the name of counter-insurgency, the Burmese government stands guilty of denying all rights and freedoms, including the most basic human right for food. The resulting picture is a grim portrayal of human suffering. Displaced peasants whose villages and crops have been burnt flee into eastern Burma's rugged jungles, hiding from marauding soldiers in army-declared "free fire" zones. Without food or health care, children die from malnutrition and simple disease, thousands of villages have been strategically relocated, leaving innumerable persons without land, work or a secure future.

Meanwhile, in central and lower Burma the government's army-first agricultural policy denies rice to the very farmers who grow it. The government enforces an exorbitant paddy quota, collecting rice for the army and civil service regardless of hunger in the rice-producing heartland. Burmese rice procured at gunpoint or under threat of land confiscation is then offered up for sale on the world market, feeding hard currency into a state which spends 40% of its budget on the army.
Recommendations

By focusing global attention on basic economic rights, the Tribunal hopes to promote the needs and interests of rural Burma in the international discourse on human rights and democratization. Thus raising awareness about people's fundamental rights to benefit from their local natural resource for food, employment social security and cultural identity. It then makes recommendations to the Burmese government, opposition political and military groups, the UN and the NGOs.

Tribunal's report: Voice of the Hungry Nation is available on-line at www.hrschool.org/tribunal


PATH FINDERS

Bishop John Joseph is QUI YUAN of South Asia.

Chinese people are proud of QUI YUAN, who lived in 200 B.C. The manner of his life and death has made him such an important person in the Chinese folk history that he is celebrated every year by a holiday arid by Dragon Boat festival. In fact he is the symbol of the Chinese spirit of protest for all times,

Qui Yuan was an advisor to the emperor and is known as one clear headed man in a very confused country at a difficult time. Qui Yuan knowing his people gave a set of advise to the emperor; so as to some things and to make the lives of the people better. The emperor ignored his advice. To stress the importance of his advise, Qui Yuan drowned himself' in a river. His protest drew the attention of the people.

He is celebrated in many ways in post revolutionary China too. At Wuhan in Hubei province, one of the largest gardens has his statute at the entrance.

Bishop John Joseph of Pakistan is not an Ancient hero hut a Modern one. He too was a very clear headed man living in a confused country. His country's blindness came from religious fundamentalism. Under the blasphemy law persons were condemned to death. After protesting against this for a long time, the Bishop realized the depth of the problem, when mobs encouraged by fanatical clerics killed one of his people in front of the court. A short time later, the Bishop after promising that he will sacrifice his life to stop this from happening, shot himself to death in front of the same court. His death shocked whole of Pakistan.

Bishop John Joseph thus represents the great spirit of protest not only for the people of Pakistan but also for South Asia in general This needs to be celebrated and the cause far which he gave his life needs to be pursued with courage and dedication.

Basil Fernando writing from Wuhan, China

Posted on 1999-10-25



remarks:1
Asian Human Rights Commission
For any suggestions, please email to support@rghr.net.

8 users online
1843 visits
1861 hits