|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
RELIGIOUS PERSPECTIVES ON HUMAN RIGHTS
E-Newsletter
Vol.1 No.1
14 May, 1999
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Religious Perspectives on Human Rights is now available online at: http://www.rghr.net
Religious Perspectives on Human Rights is a weekly e-newsletter issued by Buddhist, Muslim, Catholic and Christian Groups on Human Rights, initiated by the Asian Human Rights Commission.
- An Open Letter to Justice And Peace Group in Sri Lanka on
Police Reforms
- Responses to the Announcement of the launching of the
Asian Catholic Group
- From George Pulikuthiyil CMI , Kerala ,India and
Rosaline Costa, Bangladesh
- Buddhism And Human Rights- The Statement of the
Consultation held from 4-6 June
At Colombo organized by AHRC and Ecumenical Centre,
Colombo- Sri Lanka
An Open Letter to Justice And Peace Group in Sri Lanka
on Police Reforms
Director
Justice and Peace Desk
SEDEC
133, Kingsley Road
Colombo 8
Sri Lanka
Sedec@slt.lk
14-06-1999
Dear Sir/ Madam
Re. Request to
Engage in Actions for Police Reforms
The Asian Human Rights
Commission is presenting you a copy of a report of a consultation
on Police Reforms in Sri Lanka. We are sending this document to
you with the request to your organization to take suitable steps
to get the Catholics involve in the issue of police reforms in
Sri Lanka. I am sure that it is not necessary to impress on you
the critical importance of the issue as you are no doubt aware of
the serious breakdown of the police institution in the country
and the serious impact it has on every aspect of the
individuals as well as of the society.
We wish to request from
you to consider the following and other actions:
- The Justice and
Peace groups to study this document and develop a plan of
its own to promote democratic police reforms in Sri
Lanka.
- To take suitable
steps to make the Catholic hierarchy, particularly the
Bishops Conference aware of the issue and urge them to
take suitable action on this issue.
- To discuss the
issue with the Sri Lankan Police and any other
institutions or persons that you think can bear influence
in bringing reforms.
- To educate the
Catholic clergy and laity about the issue and what they
can do to help in bringing about change.
- Whatever other
action you think fit for the purpose of deepening
understanding of the issue and in bringing about change.
In our view whatever you
do to help in dealing with the issue will go a long away in
resolving other issues such as ethnic crisis, bitterness among
the young people in the South and much of the frustrations
relating to rule of law and due process in the country.
Vigil Lanka Movement and
Asian Human Rights Commission will extend whatever cooperation
you may request for this purpose.
Thank you!
Basil Fernando
Executive Director
Address of the Vigil Lanka Movement
Mr. Sunil Corray, Attorney At Law
Chair-person
Vigil Lanka Movement
Kala-eliya Road
Jaela
Responses to Launching of Asian Catholic Group
Greetings from George
Pulikuthiyil of JANANEETHI !
I am George Pulikuthiyil
CMI, a catholic priest of Carmelite order and a practicing human
rights lawyer of the High Court of Kerala state in India. I am
very happy to hear about the formation of Asian Catholic Group
for Human Rights as part of Asian Human Rights Commission. I
promise you my full support to and solidarity with the lofty
ideals of the noble venture.
In 1992 I founded a
registered charitable society for protection and promotion of
Human Rights. It is known as JANANEETHI, which means 'justice of
the people'
Jananeethi is intended
for providing free legal aid and assistance to the marginalised
and, to protect and promote human rights. You are invited to
visit our website at http://www.jananeethi.org for details.
In 1997, at the
initiative of some of us, a movement for human rights in the
church was launched. It was inaugurated on the 25th August 1997
and was known as Forum for the Defence of Human Rights in the
Church. I am interested to share with you our experience in my
next letter. This is primarilly intended to express our joy and
satisfaction in proclaiming our solidarity with you. Kindly put
me on your mailing list and keep me informed of your activities.
With every good wish and
in high appreciation,
George Pulikuthiyil
Advocate & Executive Secretary of Jananeethi,
Kess Bhavan, Thrissur 680001, Kerala, India.
Ph: 91-487-335672/330084/420502
Fax:91-487-335029/334331
Website: http://www.jananeethi.org
E-mail:
jananeethi@vsnl.com
From Rosaline Costa
Congratulations for the
initiative you have taken. It is indeed a great initiative at
this moment of religious crisis in our region. One of my
suggestions will be : to involve as many priests and religious as
possible from our region. My experience is that our hierarchies
want to take the credit and does not support human rights or
justice work. They themselves are very far from doing justice
work or directly involving themselves for human rights. Very few
of them, who are committed for these work, are not even supported
by the other majorities. One example is Fr.Balassuria and
Fr.Timm.
Secondly, the women
religious should also be involved with these work and they should
be given proper training, motivation through workshops, seminars
and practical activities.
Thirdly, the
"ordinary laymen" should be given more emphasis for
working together with the hierarchies for the work of justice and
human rights because when some problem arises from the other
fundamental groups from other communities, the laymen take more
effective steps than these religious people (in Bangladesh
context specially). Religious persecution means the laymen
persecution and not the religious (with few exceptions in our
region).
Therefore, more and more
laymen should be involved in this process.
With all the best wishes
for your new initiatives and with praters,
Rosaline Costa
Buddhism, Human Rights and Social Renewal
A group of concerned individuals (clergy and
householders) met in consultation on the theme Buddhism, Human
Rights and Social Renewal. This colloquium was sponsored by the
Asian Human Rights Commission, Hong Kong and took place at the
Ecumenical Institute for Study and Dialogue, Colombo Sri Lanka.
After three days (4th - 6th June 1999) deliberation and exchange
of experiences and views, the group arrived at the following
consensus on how Buddhist values and principles could provide an
inspiration for those striving to safeguard and promote human
dignity and thereby contribute to the building up of an
egalitarian and dharmishta society.
The Buddhas Vision of a Social Humanity
and a Humane Society
The Buddha gave his Message of Liberation for
the well being and happiness of the many-folk (bahujana), out of
compassion for the world. The Goal of the Noble Eightfold Path is
the eradication of human suffering in all its dimensions. It
fully recognizes that every human being, irrespective of gender,
ethnicity, caste or class has an unalienable right to the
fullness of life, liberty and happiness. After six years of
investigation, experimentation and struggle, the Buddha broke
through to a liberating understanding about the nature and the
cause of human suffering: Suffering in the world is not the
result of chance, determined by fate or the will of a Divine: it
is the result of conditions produced by human beings
themselves; human beings can therefore identify these
conditions and eradicate them.
The Buddha founded a Fourfold Sangha (Male and
Female Renouncers and Householders)
pto exemplify and propagate the values and the
principles of his Dharma. He referred to the people to whom
offered his Dharma as the bahujana. He thereby recognised that
the human species is made up of a diversity of physical forms and
a plurality of linguistic and cultural formations. He insisted
that his Dharma should be taught and expounded everywhere in the
language of the people (Vinaya Pitaka II.139)
A Sickness Within and
a Sickness Without
The Buddha described the
human condition as a sickness within and a sickness without. He
thereby clearly recognized that personal and social suffering are
mutually conditioning factors. The diseased human condition is a
product of human action. The colonial period produced serious
deformations in Sri Lankan society. New social conditions have
emerged which are combination of indigenous and Western modes of
domination and exploitation. The local elites who took over the
political leadership of the country after Independence have made
little or no effort to change this state of affairs. The majority
of the people continue to bear all the burdens of society without
enjoying its advantages. The elites who have ruled the country
during the fifty years after Independence have made little or no
effort to create a truly participatory democracy. Democracy
remains a formality and is confined to the electoral process.
However, the people are not the simple victims of circumstances.
They too subscribe to views and values and reproduce
relationships, institutions and forms of social discrimination
which, repeatedly give birth and rebirth to oppressive
conditions.
To bring about a change
in this situation, the people must overcome their ignorance (
avijja) about the real causes of their suffering and become
aware of the dehumanizing character of the conditions in which
they live. The Mirror of the Dhamma can be an effective means to
activate critical consciousness. The mutual support and social
solidarity of the first Buddhists can inspire them to break out
of the samsaric culture of silence and submission which shackles
them and to embark on the Way that leads to true freedom and
happiness. The Buddha declared that in his New Society there will
be only one flavour, the flavour of freedom ( The Book of
Discipline V.335)
Manifesto for a New
Society
The Buddha and the first
Buddhists were great innovators. They propagated their views in
everyday language and plain style devoid of mysticism and
abstract speculation. Their views on social and political issues
are invariably cast in the form of parables and legends so that
the broad masses of the people could readily grasp their content.
This shows their democratic concern with informing and educating
the ordinary people. In the Vasettha Sutra ( Majjhima
Nikaya 98), the Buddha demonstrated and declared that
all human beings belong to one and the same species (jati).
Gender and social identities are not the product of biology but
conceptualisations and reifications of repeated practices. They
are cultural not natural differences. Brahmin theologians
of the Buddha's Day claimed, as they do to this day, that the
hierarchical division of society into priests, aristocrats,
property owning peasants and artisans and propertyless wage
labourers and slaves was a manifestation of their separate
natures as determined by the Creator God Brahma. The Buddha
dismissed this as a spurious claim. In the Agganna Sutra (Digha
Nikaya 111.21), beginning with simple and undifferentiated
gatherer-hunter tribes, he elucidated that these divisions were
the result of a gradual social evolution. He also traced the
emergence of the monarchy and the State to an originally social
contract made by people with the emergence of each social stratum
as well as of the monarchy, he repeatedly insisted.
Their origin was
from among these same beings, like themselves, no different,
and in accordance with the Dharma (conditioned co-genesis)
and not contrary to Dharma.
The principles
formulated, by the Buddha in this discourse provides the basis
for a preamble to a Charter on Human Rights.
- All men and women
belong to the same species and share the same nature
- All men and women
are equal according to a Fundamental Law which is in
accordance with actuality - Dharma
- Power does not come
from above but from the people. What constitutes the
power of a king
or a state is the Great Consent of
the People - Mahajana Sammata or Great Elect.
- As originally
intended by the covenant, government should be, of the
people, by the people, for the people.
- Rulers (rajas)
should gladden the hearts of their people by righteous
(dharmishta) rule. Governments whether
monarchical ( rastra) or republican ( gana
sanghas) which fail to do so, abuse the mandate
of the people and are illegitimate
Principles of
Righteous Governance
The Cakkavatti Sihanada
Sutra (The Lions Roar on the Turning of the Wheel) enunciates
principles for righteous rule. The Buddha suggests that the
ruling elites are aware of their duties and responsibilities but
consciously decide to rule according to their caprices and become
despots. He attributes the historical origins of crime and
immorality to a single root cause - poverty - which arises not
due to natural causes but because those in power failed to ensure
an equitable distribution of wealth. To emancipate themselves
from oppressive conditions, the people do not have to await a
Saviour or a Liberator. Conditions will change only if people
become aware of the real causes of crime and immorality and begin
a movement for the moral transformation of society.
In the Buddha's Day, the
Wheel (of the War Chariot) had become an evocative symbol of
State power, which extends along vertical and horizontal axes.
Along the vertical axis it maintained a stratified social order.
Along the horizontal axis it administered society in concentric
circles from the capital city to the countryside. The monarchs of
the Buddha's Day were regarded as Wheel Turners because they
reproduced this social order, using its monopoly of the means of
violence (the rod and the sword). The Buddha took this symbol and
gave it a new signification. In his first sermon the Buddha
called himself the Turner of the Wheel of Righteousness (Dharma).
He invited rulers to imitate his example. The legend of the Wheel
Turner begins with the rule of kings who attempted to rule justly
in the tradition of the Great Elect. These kings were Turners of
the Wheel of Righteousness ( Dharma). According to brahmin
theology the King ruled according to this own dharma
(nature in brahmin theory). The Buddha attacked this
justification of despotism.
The Buddha and the first
Buddhists publicly declared that the King too is subject to the
same Dharma as his subjects. This is an anticipation
of constitutional rule and the rule of law.
Foremost among the
insignia of a Righteous Ruler is the Wheel of Righteousness. The
Wheel of Righteousness is enshrined above the Palace of Justice
and casts its radiance even into the interior of the Kings
inner chambers (read, responsible and transparent governance).
The King takes the initiative to appoint respected members of the
citizenry to monitor his rule and complain to him whenever he
departs from the principles of just governance. The Buddha
recognized the importance of a Sentinel Function in society: it
is not enough merely to have a democratic constitution, the
citizenry should make sure that it is also implemented.
The first righteous king
retired in old age and handed over the throne to his son. He
inherited all the insignia of state power but the Wheel of
Righteousness disappeared from its place. The anxious prince
sought out his father and asked why this had happened. "The
Wheel of Righteousness, my son, he was told, "is not a
paternal inheritance. You must earn it by righteous conduct.
Here, the Buddha lays down an important principle. A society may
have different ways of determining the legal right to rule. But
the rule becomes legitimate in the eyes of people only if rulers
govern righteously. Clearly, the Buddhas aim is to
substitute hereditary and legal privilege by purely moral
standards. He thereby conveys his conviction that the regulation
of human affairs is first and foremost an ethical not
political question.
When a king or party
gains access to state power, they should, as it were, reconquer
the hearts and minds of the people. The new king tours his
kingdom and instructs his people in the five basic and
indispensable rules of morality: The first - Do not take life -
the right recognizes the right to life not only of humans but of
all sentient beings. The second - Do not appropriate what has not
been given. Here the presumption is that when wealth is equitably
distributed there would be no need to steal. Third - Do not
misuse speech to harm anyone. Abstain from misuse of sensual
pleasures, especially sexual pleasure. Fifth - Abstain from
intoxicating substances. The reason given for this is that
addiction to intoxicating substances is harmful to the user as
well as the others. King and subject are urged to adhere to these
five precepts.
Men and women who lead
exemplary moral lives are indispensable as role models for
society. The king is asked to honour, support and periodically
consult them on matters of governance.
He should use his power
not to oppress, but to protect not only his subject but also the
birds and beasts in his realm.
Last but not the least,
he should ensure an equitable distribution of wealth in his
kingdom.
Social and Economic
Rights
In the Kutadanta and
Sigalovada Sutras the Buddha formulates in greater detail how the
above principles should be implemented. In the Kutadanta Sutra
the Buddha outlines his views about political economy. Cast in
legendary form, the Sutra begins with conditions of anarchy in
the kingdom of a despotic king: there is widespread crime and the
countryside is bristling with rebellion. The king decides to
unleash state terror in order to crush and eradicate the
criminals and terrorists. His Chaplain advises him to follow a
saner plan. Instead of hoarding wealth in the state confers, use
it to stimulate the productivity of the people: Give land and
seed to the peasants. Provide livestock breeders with grasslands
to pasture their animals. Provide traders with capital. Ensure
that wage labourers, especially those in royal service, are paid
a just wage. The king follows this plan and the country prospers
and peace and security is restored. The people with joy in their
hearts dwelt in unlocked homes dancing their children in their
arms. In the Noble Eightfold Path Right livelihood is included as
an indispensable feature of his Ethical Path. Implicitly he
recognises that everyone has a right to a livelihood. The Buddha
advocates a Middle Path between absolute state control and
ethically uninformed private enterprise.
In the society of the
Buddhas Day, as indeed until very recently, in all
societies worldwide the household was the corner stone of the
economy. The productive labour in North East Indian society at
the time, was performed by wage labourers and domestic slaves.
The Buddhas advice to the head of a household, in the Sigalovada
Sutra (Digha Nikaya III. 31) is in fact a social charter on
workers rights. The Buddha begins by formulating the antecedent
duties of employers. The contemporary relevance of the following
principles can be appreciated if one recognizes that they
correspond to Articles 23 and 24 of the UNs Universal
Declaration of Human Rights. The head of the household as head of
a productive unit should
- allocate work
according to the strength and abilities of his employees
- yathabalam
kammanata samvidhadena
- Provide food and
(just) wages to his workers - bhatta-vetananuppadabena
- Provide health care
for his workers -
gilan upatthena
- Cultivate close
friendship with the workers - acchariyanam rasanam
samvibhgena
- Not exploit their
labour power, but recognize their right to periodic
leisure and rest - samaye vossaggena
The Social Dimension
of the Buddhas Dharma: Salient Features and Specific
Concerns
Buddhist concern
encompasses a wider field than that encompassed by the
conventional human rights discourse. It includes compassionate
concern for all sentient beings and the living environment. The
Goal of the Buddha's Way is the realization of maitriya or
universal and non discriminatory friendliness towards every
living being.
The five precepts lay
down the basic principles of morality that should inform all
social concerns.
The Buddha recognised
that even his mendicant disciples had a right to four
basic. necessities or conditions of life/catu paccaya
(Cf. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 25). Every
human being likewise has a right to:
Food - pindapata
Clothing - civara
Housing - senasana
Medicine - gilanpaccaya
Care for the aged is a
deeply respected component of Buddhist ethic.
The Buddhas
emphasis on the moral obligations of those in positions of power,
underscores an important fact. The formulation of rights and
their incorporation into law, is meaningless unless they are
regarded as obligations and implemented.
The Buddhas
insight into the character of human action - karma - is
that conditions in which humans find themselves are the product
of conditions created by humans. Humans can therefore change
them. In his teaching the concern with personal welfare and
social welfare are
not separate but are two aspects of the struggle for freedom from
suffering: In protecting oneself one protects others; in
protecting others one protects others ( Samyukta Nikaya
47,19)
The Buddha believed in
the educability and perfeticibilty of human beings. He condemned
resort to performing miracles to converts as an abhorrent
practice. He believed only in one miracle, he said -the Miracle
of Education (Digha Nikaya III.p.213) .
The Buddha founded a
community to exemplify and mediate the values of his Dharma.
He emphasized that people need to promote each others welfare by
mutual advice and upliftment - annam anna vacanena annam anna
vuthapanena
The Buddha described the
spirit that should inform the communities of the disciples as kalyana
mittata - beautiful friendship. Ananda once suggested that
the beautiful friendship of the Sangha is a partial realization
of the Goal of the Path. The Buddha in reply stated: Not so,
Ananda. Beautiful friendship is the Goal and the Consummation of
the Noble Path (Samyukta Nikaya 1.88). The Buddha believed
that when human beings care for each other in kalyana
mittata they would need neither the gods nor earthly
potentates to protect them. They would have no other refuge
sarana but the Dharma (Digha Nikaya 11.102).
The participants in the
spirit of Kalyama Mittata hope that this report would
stimulate further inquiry and discussion but above all useful to
those engaged in work leading to social renewal and restoration
of human rights.
Posted on 1999-05-14
remarks:1 |