Asian Human Rights Commission - Religious Groups for Human Rights

Home

Archives

AHRC Site

Search this section:
Advanced Search
Printer Friendly Version
Vol. 01. No. 11 (August 23, 1999)


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
RELIGIOUS PERSPECTIVES ON HUMAN RIGHTS

E-Newsletter
Vol.1 No.11
August 23, 1999


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Religious Perspectives on Human Rights is now available online at: http://www.rghr.net

Religious Perspectives on Human Rights is a weekly e-newsletter issued by Buddhist, Muslim, Catholic and Christian Groups on Human Rights, initiated by the Asian Human Rights Commission.


We have been requested to share this information with you. However it has also been requested NOT TO take any direct action at this moment. If action is needed you will be informed.

Post Script; Information just received indicates that the charges against the two eminent persons have been withdrawn by the police and that ends the case of this unfair harassment.

Police Harassment of Bishop Dr. A. George Ninan

Bishop Dr. A. George & Dr. James Massey continue to be victims of police harassment due to the bold stand they took jointly with the Christian for A Secular Democratic India (a recently formed national forum bringing together radical Christians committed to strengthening secular democratic polity and distancing themselves from otherwise communal/fanatical responses in the present situation) in defeating the forces of fascism in the country during the forthcoming Parliamentary Elections `99.

An editorial written in The Asian Age (a daily newspaper with world-wide circulation) highlighting the issue in the context of Wadhwa Commission 's findings on the murder of Australian missionary Graham Stains and his two sons in Orissa earlier this year sums it up aptly as:

"…and it is not surprising that coinciding with its release, the Maharashtra government has issued arrest warrants against National Minorities Commission member Dr. James Massey and Bishop of Nasik Dr. George Ninan. For doing little more than attending a small meeting of Christians social activists at Ahmednagar after which Bishop Ninan admitted to persistent media persons that he would personally not be voting for the Shiv Sena or the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). That was enough to get the local Shiv Sainics to file an FIR with the police against the two well-respected members. And the police machinery, which is over-protective about criminals like Dara Singh, has been very efficient in harassing Bishop Ninan with investigating officers making numerous visits to his residence. The deputy chief minister of Maharashtra, Mr. Gopinath Munde, is in charge of home affairs and the police and the harassment of the Bishop can be directly placed at his door. This is part of the continuing attack on the Christian minorities and an issue which the Wadhwa Commission report does not address…"

At a National Consultation on KAIROS INDIA 2000; A Process for Reflection for Social Activists from 1- 3 August, at Ahmednagar in Maharashtra, about 40 social activists, academics and community leaders deliberated on the question of future of social action at the grass-roots level while taking stock of the past 25-years of involvement in the people's struggles. A draft Statement of Conscience to be issued on the elections eve clarifying the political position of social action groups was discussed.

At a press conference on 2 August, jointly addressed by Bishop Dr. George Ninan and Dr. James Masssey, the contents of the statement calling people to strengthen the secular democratic polity by defeating the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) were shared. Being questioned on the alternative, a response based on regional reality and progressive party alliances was suggested. During such questioning by the press, Bishop Ninan suggested that personally he would support the Nationalist Congress Party in Maharashtra.

The report appearing next day i.e. 3 August in the press included various versions of the statement, emphasising the Brahminic, Manuvadi Fascist tendencies and Hindutva ideology for opposing the BJP party at the forthcoming elections.

On August 4, when the citizens along with the CNI diocesan community of Nasik were celebrating the life and works of Bishop Ninan on his retirement from active Bishopric of five years, news-papers reported that police was taking suo motto action against Bishop Ninan and Dr. Massey u/s 125 of the Representation of People's Act,1951, which deals with 'an attempt to promote on grounds of religion - community - feelings of hatred between different classes of the citizens of India'. This is a non-bailable offence with three years of imprisonment or fine or both.

People's perception about such an action was that the case instituted against Bishop Ninan and Dr. Massey was not only false and fabricated but politically motivated. The visit of the Dy. Chief Minister & Home Minister of Maharashtra State, Shri Gopinath Munde on August 3 to Ahmednagar strengthened such a people's perception.

The public reaction on this news was that of anger and protest, as it amounted to violation of civil liberties under Article 19(1) (a) of the Constitution guaranteeing freedom of speech and expression. Opinions sought from legal luminaries like Adv. K.G. Kannabiran, National President, People's Union For Civil Liberties, Justice S M Daud, (retired), Adv. R Venkatramani, etc., confirmed that the FIR was a frivolous piece of document and must be thoroughly exposed. The statement issued both by the Bishop Ninan & Dr. Massey did not violate any section of the Representation of People's Act, 1951 leave a side section 125, under which the criminal case has been registered.

A section of the FIR makes an interesting reading:

"……it is alleged that Rev. Dr. James Massey, Member , Minority Commission, Government of India, New Delhi, used government transport to attend the press conference at St. Savior's High School Meeting Hall wherein the issue of the forthcoming Parliamentary and Assembly elections was discussed. He addressed the Christian community with the intention that the churches should not now pray for good change or good assistance and help but instead play a dynamic and important role in the forthcoming elections. The member of the churches should vote for such persons who will fight against Fascism, Brahminism and Manuvad and protect the poor, the dalits and marginalised from such 'isms'. At present the democratic process in our country is in danger of being suppressed by dictatorship and we need to safeguard secularism from being communalised. Such statements were made at the said press conference and pamphlets asking the Christian voters to desist from voting for BJP but instead vote for Congress-1) and the Nationalist Congress Party. They (Rev. Ninan and James Massey ) urged the minority Christian community challenging them to vote for either the Republican Party, Congress- 1 or Nationalist Congress Party…"

(English translation from Marathi original - unofficial)

In fact, the entire FIR is baseless as neither any pamphlets nor any statement to the effect of calling the minority Christian community to vote for or against any particular political party was distributed during the press conference or the National Consultation. A Draft Statement entitled: A STATEMENT OF CONSCIENCE AGAINST THE FORCES OF FASCISM, being finalised to be issued on the Election eve prepared by a draft committee of which neither Bishop Ninan nor Dr. Massey was a member. The press statement circulated by Dr. Rev. James Massey at the press conference was, in fact, in English, and did not contain any statement or calling to vote for or against any particular party.

On August 6, around 11 a.m. the police Sub-Inspector, along with a policeman and a tailor from the minority Christian community came to Bishop Ninan’s office, and informed him of the crime registered by the Tofkhana Police Station, Ahmednagar. The Police Sub-Inspector also informed Bishop Ninan that he would arrest him. However, Bishop Ninan’s bail arrangements had also been informally made by the police, and if Bishop Ninan took bail, the matter would rest there, for the time being. The tailor from the Christian community was brought by the police with this purpose of offering bail on behalf of Bishop. Bishop Ninan refused to take the bail and offered to be arrested, as he had not committed any crime. He further said that it was on moral grounds that he was refusing to be released on bail, as he had not violated any law but had freely expressed his personal political option during the forthcoming Parliamentary Elections `99.

At this time, staff and citizens present in the vicinity of Bishop’s Office also offered to voluntarily court arrest in solidarity with the Bishop and in protest against the police harassment. The police party returned with the promise to return in the afternoon to arrest Bishop Ninan.

By the afternoon, citizens of Ahmednagar, cutting across religious lines, gathered in the Bishop’s House in large numbers. Public opinion was also mobilised on what was a blatant act of police harassment. By the evening it became clear that the police wold not come to arrest Bishop in spite of threat. But the citizens continued to express their anger and protest on this matter.

On August 7, representatives of the citizens, including lawyers, teachers, youth, women, political and social leaders met the District Administration with their two main demands:

a) Unconditionally withdraw false and fabricated criminal case against Bishop Dr. A George Ninan and Dr. Rev. James Massey:

b) Independent inquiry into the complicity of the politicians and officials into the matter and take appropriate action against the erring persons.

Similar demands were sent with protest telegrams and faxes to the Chief Secretary, Government of Maharashtra from all over the country by renowned individuals and people’s organisations. Signature campaign demanding un-conditional withdrawal of the false criminal case, Satyagrahis offering to voluntarily court arrest, women and children offering to take out marches and rally, were being planned.

On August 9, a memorandum containing 5,500 signatures was submitted to the District Magistrate, Ahmednagar. People also came from neighbouring rural areas to join the protest programmes.

Protest letters and statements were issued by people’s organisations and political parties. Prominent among these were People’s Union for Civil Liberties, Indian Social Action Forum (INSAF), Chattisgarh Mukti Morcha, Vikas Adhyayan Kendra, Republican Party of India, Communist Party of India (Marxist), Nationalist Congress Party, Congress-1. Citizen’s Forum met at New Delhi to decide to stage a day-long Dharna in front of Maharashtra Bhawan on August 13. Similarly, solidarity groups were formed in Bangalore, Ernakulam, Nagpur, Mumbai, etc., where social action groups, human rights organisations, artists, and academics are planning protest and legal action in the matter. Manav Hakk Jagruti Abhiyan at Ahmednagar brought together citizen’s for action on the street and in the court.

A meeting of about 40 individuals and organisations of Mumbai on August 11 has decided to file a Writ Petition challenging the FIR. In addition, public protest meeting is being organised to highlight the harassment of Bishop Ninan.

In the meantime, the Chairman of the Commission on Minorities of Government of India has written to the Prime Minister and Home Minister of India to look into the matter.

According to reports available here, the District administration of Ahmednagar has formed a five-member sub-committee consisting of three revenue and two police personnel to look into the matter. The public is, however, not satisfied with the move, as it wants the false case to be un-conditionally withdrawn. According to some of them, if the government was serious about investigating the case, it should have appointed a high-level enquiry commission, and not depend on local government servants who were vulnerable to political pressure.

Bishop S George Ninan has shifted to Mumbai after his retirement from office of Bishop of Nasik Diocese of the Church of North India. He is, in fact, looking forward to continuing his ecumenical ministry by taking charge as the first ever full-time Secretary of the Joint Council of CNI, CSI & Mar Thomas Church in India, a prestigious position offered to him only on August 12, 1999.


ANNOUNCEMEN

Some items from the past issues of this E-Newsletter are colourfully presented in the Human Rights SOLDIARITY Volume 9. No. 8, August 1999 issue:

NEW PUBLICATIONS. The Buddhist Teachings on Human Liberation- A Doctoral Thesis- By Dr. Nalin Swaris

Posted on 1999-08-23



remarks:1
Asian Human Rights Commission
For any suggestions, please email to support@rghr.net.

6 users online
2459 visits
2511 hits